Create a free account and describe your company. With the trial, CanPursue checks every opportunity against it and explains the fit.
Create free accountCreate a free account to see past contracts like this one: who won and at what price.
Create free accountTrade Agreement: Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) Tendering Procedures: All interested suppliers may submit a bid Competitive Procurement Strategy: Best Overall Proposal Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement: No Nature of Requirements:
ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR EXPLOSIVE DEVICE FIELD TRIALS - Ralston, Alberta
1. TITLE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR EXPLOSIVE DEVICE FIELD TRIALS
2. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS There are security requirements associated with this requirement. For additional information, consult Part 6 - Security, Financial and Other Requirements, and Part 7 - Resulting Contract Clauses.
3. REQUIREMENT Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC), Suffield Research Centre (SRC) has conducted studies of high energy explosive phenomena using a variety of energetic material devices, explosive detection devices and explosive neutralization devices, in support of the Canadian Forces (CAF) to enhance existing capability and introduce new capabilities, and to produce a rapidly deployable, easily sustainable, force capable of providing relevant capabilities to train for and conduct full spectrum, Adaptive Dispersed Operations (ADO) in the future operating environment. Currently, SRC has requirements to continue studies in these areas. In order to lead these studies to success, support of engineering and technical services is required from outside sources.
4. PERIOD OF THE CONTRACT The estimated period of the contract is from date of award to 2019-03-31.
5. EVALUATION CRITERIA Mandatory technical criteria and point rated criteria are included in Annex "G"
6. BASIS OF SELECTION To be declared responsive, a bid must: 1) comply with all the requirements of the bid solicitation; 2) meet all mandatory technical evaluation criteria; and 3) obtain the required minimum points for the technical evaluation criteria which are subject to point rating: a) SAMPLE TASK AUTHORIZATION EVALUATION: 22/32 points b) OVERALL PROPOSAL EVALUATION: 31/44 points c) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION: 17/24 points Bids not meeting (a) or (b) or (c) will be declared non responsive. The responsive bid with the highest number of points will be recommended for award of a contract, provided that the total evaluated price does not exceed the budget available for this requirement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Crown Owned Delivery Date: Above-mentioned
The Crown retains the right to negotiate with suppliers on any procurement.
Documents may be submitted in either official language of Canada.
Not stated in the notice: procurement type, procurement method, selection criteria, region of delivery, region of opportunity, expected contract period, end user
No amendments observed.
No attachments listed in the open data.
No contact listed in the open data.