CanPursue

Research

  • Search
  • Opportunities
  • Buyers
  • Suppliers
  • Contracts
  • Awards

Intelligence

  • OverviewAccount required
  • WatchlistsAccount required
  • PipelineAccount required
  • IntelligenceAccount required
Create free account

Sign in

⌘K
ENFR
Mediation Services for the Farm Debt Mediation Service (FDMS) in the province of Manitoba | Agriculture and Agri-food Canada · CanPursue
Opportunities
Fit is part of the trial and paid plans.Closed

Mediation Services for the Farm Debt Mediation Service (FDMS) in the province of Manitoba

Agriculture and Agri-food Canada01B68-23-0045Federal
Find on CanadaBuysAdd to pipeline
Published
Oct 30, 2023
Respond by
Dec 19, 2023
Latest amendment
—5 amendments

See how this opportunity fits your company

Create a free account and describe your company. With the trial, CanPursue checks every opportunity against it and explains the fit.

Create free account

Who won similar work

Create a free account to see past contracts like this one: who won and at what price.

Create free account

Description

1.2 Summary 1.2.1 The Farm Debt Mediation Act (FDMA) received Royal Assent on April 25, 1997 and came into force on April 1,1998. The Farm Debt Mediation Service (FDMS) was established to deliver the FDMA. The service provides a streamlined process of mediation to assist insolvent farmers and their creditors to negotiate settlement arrangements, rather than have those disputes result in costly legal proceedings for all parties. A Mediator is assigned to assist the farmer and creditors explore options for the successful resolution of the case. To apply for assistance under the FDMA, an individual, corporation, partnership, cooperative or other association of persons must be "engaged in farming for commercial purposes", meaning that the production from their crops, livestock, or other eligible commodities is commercially available for sale as opposed to being grown for the personal use of the farmer or for a person related to the farmer as defined in the regulations. The applicant must also be "insolvent”, which is defined in article 6 of the FDMA as follows: Page 4 of - de 38 Only farmers: • who are for any reason unable to meet their obligations as they generally become due; • who have ceased paying their current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due; or • the aggregate of whose property is not, at a fair valuation, sufficient, or if disposed of at a fairly conducted sale under legal process would not be sufficient, to enable payment of all their obligations, due and accruing due. Under the FDMA, farmers can apply for review and mediation only or for a Stay of Proceedings, review and mediation. There are several factors to consider in deciding how to apply. Secured creditors are obliged by the Act to serve the farmer with a Notice of Intent to Realize on Security before undertaking any action to recover debts. In this case, the farmer would usually choose the FDMS application which includes a Stay of Proceedings to prevent further action by the creditor during mediation. The farmer would also apply for a Stay when being sued for a debt by an unsecured creditor. Though unsecured creditors are not required to provide a Notice of Intent, the Stay still protects the farmer's assets during mediation. If a Notice of Intent has not been served and legal action has not been taken, the farmer may prefer to apply for review and mediation only, without applying for a Stay. Once the review and recovery plan are prepared an unbiased mediator is appointed by the Manager to meet with the farmer and their creditors to try and facilitate a comprehensive solution between the parties. Mediators must be free from any conflict of interest in the matters between the farmer and creditors and are expressly forbidden under the FDMA from providing advice to either the farmer or any of the creditors. During the mediation the farmer presents the recovery plan to the creditors and seeks their agreement to a course of action to resolve the current financial difficulties. If the farmer has applied with a Stay, the meeting would involve all creditors. If without a Stay, then the meeting would involve all secured creditors and any other creditors who need to be involved in reaching a settlement. There may be cases where a recovery plan would not be required, such as those situations where the farmer wants to negotiate an agreement for an orderly sale of assets and an exit from farming. At the conclusion of the negotiation it is critical for the parties to obtain either a signed, binding agreement or an agreement-in-principle with a well-defined plan of action for having a final agreement drawn up and signed. An assessment will be conducted by the FDMS office after completion of the mediation. The assessment will evaluate the participants' satisfaction with the FDMS office, and the mediation services and help to determine possible program changes or enhancements that may be initiated. You can find more information about the FDMS on AAFC web site: https://agriculture.canada.ca/en/programs/farm-debt-mediation-service 1.2.2 One method of supply used by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) to satisfy the requirements of our programs is to invite suppliers (by way of a Request for Standing Offer (RFSO) to submit an offer for the provision of services during a specified period. With the completed RFSO process, AAFC is authorized to make call-ups against the resulting SO’s detailing the exact level of services they wish to order at a particular time during the effective period of the SO, in accordance with the predetermined conditions. A RFSO does not commit AAFC to authorize the utilization of an SO or to obtain services or issue a subsequent Contract to this effect. A standing offer is not a contract and that the issuance of an SO and Call-up Authority does not oblige or commit Canada to procure or contract for any services listed in the SO. The Offeror understands and agrees that Canada has the right to procure the services specified in the SO by means of any other contract, SO or contracting method. Page 5 of - de 38 1.2.3 The purpose of this Request for Standing Offers (RFSO) is to select Offerors to enter into negotiations with AAFC to issue Departmental Individual Standing Offers (SO) to obtain the services described in the Statement of Work for Manitoba. The total budget for the SO will be approximately $510,000.00 based on a maximum of four (4) standing offers. Services are required for a period of four (4) years, starting at date of issuance of standing offers.

Procurement

Category
Services
Jurisdiction
Federal

Not stated in the notice: procurement type, procurement method, selection criteria, region of delivery, region of opportunity, expected contract period, end user

Requirements and qualifications

Supply arrangement
Not stated in the public notice
Security requirement
Not stated in the public notice
Trade agreements
—
Limited tendering reason
—

Classification

GSIN
—
UNSPSC
—

Amendments

The source reports 5 amendments. CanPursue observed 1 of them with dates.

  • Amendment 5Dec 19, 2023
  • Original noticeOct 30, 2023

Documents

No attachments listed in the open data.

Contact

No contact listed in the open data.

Related

More from this buyer

No related records observed.

Linked contracts

No related records observed.

Source

Find on CanadaBuys

CanPursue has no direct link to this notice. This opens a CanadaBuys search for its solicitation number.

Source
CanadaBuys
Solicitation
01B68-23-0045
Observed
Sep 27, 2026

The amount, value range and contract duration shown on some CanadaBuys pages are not in the open data, so CanPursue does not show them.

Never miss an amendment

Track this opportunity in your pipeline and watchlists with a free account.

Create free account